Farmers across the UK could now receive increased statutory compensation for thousands of birds they had to have culled, thanks to Jacksons Law Firm’s successful representation of seven poultry farmers in a judicial review.
The review concerned the government’s calculation of compensation for birds affected by Avian Influenza (AI) in 2021 and 2022.
In a landmark ruling, which followed a legal challenge brought against the Animal & Plant Health Agency (“APHA”), the High Court decided the Government has been wrongly calculating compensation.
The case, successfully brought by Jacksons Law, surrounded farmers who had carried out their statutory obligation to report suspected AI in their birds.
The farmers involved in the case fulfilled their duty to report to the APHA and the APHA sent officers to the affected farms to investigate AI on the farm.
After confirming an outbreak of AI, APHA subsequently condemned all birds on the farms for culling – including healthy animals.
The APHA officers returned at a later date to cull the birds.
Legislation provides that farmers are entitled to compensation for healthy birds culled in order to curb the spread of Avian Influenza.
But the farmers involved in the case argued they were under-compensated, as compensation should have been calculated by reference to the number of healthy birds on the date of condemnation, rather than at the point that they were actually culled.
The APHA has often delayed carrying out the cull after having condemned the birds to be culled and, as a result of those delays, thousands of birds contracted AI between condemnation and culling, and were therefore not compensated.
However, a High Court Judge has now ruled in favour of the seven farmers represented by Jacksons Law, finding that the obligation to compensate accrues at the point the healthy birds are condemned to be culled, rather than at the later point when they are actually culled.
The government must now reconsider the amount of compensation to be paid to the seven farmers – which also opens up claims for other farmers across the UK.
Toby Joel, a partner at Jacksons Law and one of the five-strong team who acted on behalf of the farmers, said: “This has been a hugely positive result for the farmers, as the Judge has recognised they did not receive the amount compensation to which they were entitled, so as to reflect the number of healthy birds in their flock when the decision is taken for those birds to be culled.
“Instead, compensation had been calculated based on the number of healthy birds at the time of culling, which often involved considerable delays, allowing the disease to spread through the flock in the interim period.
“This ruling means the government will now have to reconsider the calculation of compensation for these farmers”.
He added the ruling doesn’t end with these seven farmers, as any farmer who has claimed compensation for AI has the right to have their compensation reconsidered.
“In fact, farmers affected in previous AI outbreaks should also consider getting in contact with APHA to have their compensation reconsidered,” Mr Joel said.
While the legal claim referred to outbreaks of AI which occurred in 2021 to 2022, the Judgment also recognises that the government’s obligation to compensate farmers is a continuing one, meaning farmers affected by the APHA’s unlawful policy on AI compensation could have claims going back many years.
Mr Joel worked on the case alongside Chartered Legal Executive at Jacksons Law, Karl Medd, as well as Partner, Simon Catterall, and Barristers Malcolm Birdling and Jagoda Klimowicz, from Brick Court Chambers, London.
“This result has been achieved for hardworking farmers thanks to a fantastic team effort at Jacksons Law, as well as the sterling work and support from the National Farmers’ Union,” Mr Joel said.
“We are delighted to have been able to support the farmers involved, along with the NFU, in bringing this case to Court to enable farmers to claim the right and just level of compensation for healthy birds culled as a result of an Avian influenza outbreak.”
The farmers, all members of the National Farmers’ Union (NFU)’s Legal Assistance Scheme, used the scheme to report their claims to the NFU, who then appointed Jacksons Law Firm.
The NFU has provided significant financial support to its members throughout the proceedings.
NFU President Minette Batters said: “Today’s High Court judgment is a tremendous result for the members who brought the legal challenge, as well as the NFU and its wider membership.
“AI is a truly devasting disease and so many farmers have suffered and are still suffering the after-effects of the catastrophic outbreak witnessed in 2021/22.
“The High Court has made clear that APHA’s AI compensation policy is unlawful, and we now look to government to rectify this wrong and to pay farmers the compensation to which they are lawfully entitled.”
NFU legal board chair, Nick Hamer, said “This is an incredible result for the members involved in this case, along with the NFU and the wider poultry sector.
“The NFU’s Legal Assistance Scheme has provided significant financial support to the members bringing the claim.
“I would like to pay tribute to the dedication and expertise of the NFU’s poultry team and in-house legal department along with the fantastic support provided by NFU Panel Firm Jacksons Law Firm and legal Counsel Malcolm Birdling and Jagoda Klimowicz.
“This highlights once again the huge value of the NFU and the NFU’s LAS in supporting our members.”
Please share the article
